I think they could have taken a much gentler approach in addressing the public. I think it was good they were honest but should have addressed the public with more consideration. In dealing with war, the public is already going to be on edge. The only thing they should have done was respond as to why the benefits for using the drones would have been. An aggressive approach may work for majority of cases but not in this instance.
I would add more to the benefits of using drones. I would also take a slower approach to using them. I wouldn't immediately throw them in the public's face. In this case, the public reacted aggressive because the PR people took an aggressive approach. The whole ordeal could have been prevented or at least reduced had the PR not used full force.
No comments:
Post a Comment